National Speed Limit, NOT AGAIN!! - K-Bikes.com - Excellence in Motion
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 16 (permalink) Old Jul 5th, 2008, 7:52 pm Thread Starter
Addict
 
The Fllash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Posts: 513
National Speed Limit, NOT AGAIN!!

We all need to get ahead of this and contact your senator to stop the national speed limit.

This jackass Sen. John Warner from Virginia wanst to make a national 55 MPH speed limit.


I am sending this to all senators;

I wish to extend my strongest objection to your ridiculous suggestion to lower the speed limit to a nation 55 MPH.

With the price of gas rising, there is increased murmuring about legislating a lower speed limit in order to conserve fuel. I remarked to family this weekend that that seems to be an odd thing to attempt to legislate. Here’s why:
In 1974, the federal government legislated a national speed limit of 55 miles per hour in response to the fuel crisis of 1973. The rationale at the time was that fuel prices were high, oil was running out, and our only option was to start conserving what was left. After the fuel crisis passed, the federal speed limit was kept in place because of safety reasons: in the first few months of the federally mandated speed limit, traffic deaths actually dropped. There are two problems with this public policy: the first is economic and the second is ability to deliver on promised results.
The first problem with the federally limited speed is that it is not an economically sound policy. For example, while it was true that fuel prices were high and it was true that oil was running out, it was not true that oil was running out soon. Fossil fuels are, and should be treated as, finite resources. That said, there is so much oil available, that we Earthlings will not use up our supply for decades, if not centuries. A more economically sound way of expressing the problem is that there’s only so much oil available at a certain price. If oil costs $20/barrel, there will be less supply than if oil costs $200/barrel, because a the cheaper price restricts the amount of cost that can go into retrieving the oil. If oil were to reach $200/barrel, it would become feasible to extract oil from places that are not financially feasible to extract from at $20/barrel. Therefore, legislating a lower speed limit for the purposes of conserving a resource for which plenty of supply exists is bad public policy. In fact, it turned out that the conservation initiative only resulted in saving about 1% of the oil that otherwise would have been consumed. (Source: http://www.heritage.org/Research/SmartGrowth/bg532.cfm)
The second problem with the federal speed limit is that its supposed benefits did not stand the test of time. The drop in traffic deaths that was reported in the year following the mandated lower speed had actually vanished by 1978 and was really no more than a short term anomaly. (Source: http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=1205) Consider also that when the federal mandate was removed in 1995, the number of traffic deaths per mile travelled began to decline - as of 2006, the most recent year for which I can find data, the NHTSA reports that the number of traffic fatalities per vehicle mile travelled has decreased by 18.5% over their level in 1994, the year before the federally-mandated speed was lifted. (Source: http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspx)
An interesting question that arises is “How many more deaths could be prevented if we raised speed limits even higher?” In fact, what if we took the extreme position of having no speed limits altogether? It turns out that we actually have data that proves that removing the speed limit altogether actually reduces traffic deaths. When the federal speed limit was lifted in 1995, the state of Montana had effectively no speed limit, a regulation that was ultimately struck down for its “vagueness”. Nevertheless, before it was struck down, Montana saw its traffic fatalities fall to record low levels. When the statute was struck down and Montana reinstated numerical speed limits, the fatality rate immediately began to climb. Similar data exists for the comparison between the German autobahn, where there is no speed limit, and American interstate highways, where there is. (Source: http://www.motorists.org/pressreleas...afety-paradox/)
Legislating lower speed limits as a method of conserving fuel is public policy that endangers the public while not meaningfully reducing fuel consumption. In order to reduce traffic fatalities, neither the federal government nor state and local governments should impose a maximum limit on highway speeds.


I can not imagine living through the hell again that we had to endure from 1974 to 1995 because of you foolish politicians making this unpopular law. You people in Washington have no idea what life is like for Americans.

If you really want to reduce fuel consumption stop flying in Private jets.

NO 55 MPH


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All these Senators have a Web site with thier E Mail listed. Contact them now.
We must stop this national speed limit law.

Bazra
aka; The Flash
The Fllash is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 16 (permalink) Old Jul 6th, 2008, 5:35 am
Member
 
OldGeezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Glenwood, N B, Canada
Posts: 89
Arrow National 55 mph

Not being one to often comment on my neighbors political policy's, i can't help myself on this one..

I remember motorcycle touring extensively in the USA during the 55 mph policy, it was hell and i agree with bazra, the benefits were doubtfull.

I'm sure the resources required of various State's Police to enforce this law could be better used elsewhere....

I also agree that politicians in both of our countries have absolutely no idea of how the average joe lives.

We do have a law in Canada where Senators have to retire at age 75 before they completely loose their minds

Regards; Dave
1987 K-100 RS
One life, live it........!
OldGeezer is offline  
post #3 of 16 (permalink) Old Jul 6th, 2008, 9:24 am
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 468
"Sen. John Warner from Virginia "

Why am I not surprised. That state is a little messed up when it comes to their legislature, that's one of the reasons we chose not to move there.
iflybricks is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 16 (permalink) Old Jul 6th, 2008, 9:58 am
Statmaster
 
eljeffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Plano, TX, USA
Posts: 2,313
The idea of a national speed limit is stupid. Limits that might make sense in the congested parts of the country make no sense in the wide expanses of the west. Maybe a voluntary request to the states to lower speed limits by 5-10 mph, but not a national mandate, and NOT 55.

Become a Supporting Member of K-Bikes.com
__________________
El Jeffe
Plano, TX
'06 K1200GT Crystal Grey
'04 Sprint RS Caspian Blue
__________________
"I can make a woman orgasm so hard she screams out random numbers. Those numbers end up being winning lottery numbers." - Techfiend
eljeffe is offline  
post #5 of 16 (permalink) Old Jul 6th, 2008, 10:52 am
no power in the 'verse can stop me
 
shook sez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: n.e.ohia, , usa
Posts: 1,126
Quote:
Originally Posted by eljeffe
The idea of a national speed limit is stupid. Limits that might make sense in the congested parts of the country make no sense in the wide expanses of the west. .
They don't nake any more sense in the "congested" parts of the countrey either.

tim-----still on the right side of the frostline

you can't stop the signal
shook sez is offline  
post #6 of 16 (permalink) Old Jul 6th, 2008, 3:13 pm
Member
 
chilei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, VA, USA
Posts: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by iflybricks
"Sen. John Warner from Virginia "

Why am I not surprised. That state is a little messed up when it comes to their legislature, that's one of the reasons we chose not to move there.
There is much more than that messed up with VA. High taxes, high property taxes (if you have XM radio you are even taxed another $.60/mo... luckily the radio knows not what state it is in), high rate of fines, etc... and the WORST drivers in the world (to qualify, I have driven in most every state, lived in several as well as Italy, Germany, Albania, Slovenia, South Korea, and many others, still have not found a place that can give Virginia a run for it's money in bad drivers!).

The speed limit is ridiculous, based on old "science" which was proven wrong when it was reversed in 95, had no safety benefits, and was really nothing more than a money grab. If they want to effect some fuel savings, the state can adjust signal lights to not cycle with time and instead keep green... I can not tell you how many lights I have had to stop at as they changed while I was approaching when there was not a car in sight... they use this to slow people but you still burn gas while sitting there.
chilei is offline  
post #7 of 16 (permalink) Old Jul 6th, 2008, 5:00 pm
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 438
Angry I can't drive fifty five

If Sen. Warner or anyone else wants to drive 55 to conserve fuel they don't need to make a law, just slow down. But ***Stay out of the fooking left lane*** please.
ncooper is offline  
post #8 of 16 (permalink) Old Jul 6th, 2008, 5:02 pm
Would rather be riding
 
bonafidebob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by bazra
We all need to get ahead of this and contact your senator to stop the national speed limit.
Agreed. An additional $5/gal fuel tax (to be spent on public transit, like a real passenger rail system) would do a hell of a lot more to conserve fuel.
bonafidebob is offline  
post #9 of 16 (permalink) Old Jul 6th, 2008, 6:24 pm
Statmaster
 
eljeffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Plano, TX, USA
Posts: 2,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncooper
But ***Stay out of the fooking left lane*** please.
Fookin' A, Bubba! +1

Become a Supporting Member of K-Bikes.com
__________________
El Jeffe
Plano, TX
'06 K1200GT Crystal Grey
'04 Sprint RS Caspian Blue
__________________
"I can make a woman orgasm so hard she screams out random numbers. Those numbers end up being winning lottery numbers." - Techfiend
eljeffe is offline  
post #10 of 16 (permalink) Old Jul 6th, 2008, 9:20 pm
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 438
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by eljeffe
Fookin' A, Bubba! +1
Does this mean there are two of us here in the Austin Powers fan club. Yeah Baby!
ncooper is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the K-Bikes.com - Excellence in Motion forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"The Pace" A MUST read! cousi Bike Talk 19 Jan 8th, 2015 3:32 pm
Cal24 Rally 2008 Razel Ride Tales 5 Jun 17th, 2008 7:51 pm
Moto-Camping in Yosemite National Park rhhall Ride Tales 5 Sep 1st, 2007 12:27 am
Speed Cameras Shot BMTrevR Campfire 0 Dec 8th, 2005 4:33 pm
3000kms in 24 hours.., "Must be the First ever High speed Touring" of the K1200S ! LOCUS K12/1300S 1 Oct 21st, 2005 9:43 am

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome