GT v New Sprint ST - K-Bikes.com - Excellence in Motion
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 3 (permalink) Old Mar 29th, 2007, 9:01 am Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 34
GT v New Sprint ST

About the only gripe I have with my K1200GT is that it would be nice to have a bike with a few less kilos (or pounds to the no-metric people amongst us). As I would like to try out the more sporty end of Sports Tourer, I had a look at a 2007 Triumph Sprint ST the other day at a local dealer as a possible replacement candidate (please excuse the heresy). The press reviews have been positive, especially about the 1050cc engine, and at 213kg (dry) it is about 70kg lighter than my K1200GT.

However, on closer inspection, it become clear that one of the reasons that the Sprint ST is so much lighter is because it has been fitted with wafer thin plastic components. I was amazed at how flimsy the bike feels.

So, although the K1200GT is a big heffa-lump, I am sure it will last for a good many years over many thousands of Kilometers. Looks like the K1200GT is staying put.

Last edited by charper; Mar 29th, 2007 at 9:10 am.
charper is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 3 (permalink) Old Mar 29th, 2007, 11:47 am
Addict
 
carnadero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sillycon Valley, CA, USA
Posts: 646
The one important point for me if I'm going to replace my Brick (not likely) is, does the replacement candidate have a shaft or a chain? Chain drive for me is a no-go. My last chain bike was many, many moons ago, and I have no intention of cleaning/lubing a chain ever again, if I can help it.

Black 2002 K1200RS - "The Beast" (over 100k miles)
carnadero is offline  
post #3 of 3 (permalink) Old Mar 29th, 2007, 12:04 pm
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: , ,
Posts: 82
Triumph Sprint ST

I test rode the Triumph Sprint ST (the new one with the 1050 cc engine) before I settle on buying the new (to me) 1999 k1200RS.

As I recalled, the Sprint ST was a comfortable bike, much torquey motor. The part I didn't like was the vague steering and reactions from the front wheel. You get that sort of disconnected from the pavement feeling. Also, the instruments numbers on the dials are very small, so you could never read the speed when you are moving.

In comparison, even the K1200RS is a lot heavier, it handles and corners way better than the Sprint ST. And the brakes are much more superior. (plus shaft drive).


Plastics
plastics is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the K-Bikes.com - Excellence in Motion forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Convince me not to buy a Triumph Sprint ST! hass K12/1300S 12 May 30th, 2006 7:16 am

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome