Is it official the GT is now the LT? - K-Bikes.com - Excellence in Motion
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 16 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2005, 11:11 am Thread Starter
No bogey's twist wrist
 
dkeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, TN, USA
Posts: 619
Unhappy Is it official the GT is now the LT?

Just reading posts on k1200r forum,

The guy from Motorad at the Long Beach show said they were done with new models and the LT would be going away but not the R!
Ray

Now that I would believe, leaves the big bagger types the Goldwing alone, and the GT as an LT lite.

If it's got curves ride it.
life member NRA, GOA and Tennessee Firearms Owners Association.
dkeven is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 16 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2005, 11:29 am
Statmaster
 
eljeffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Plano, TX, USA
Posts: 2,313
I don't know where Ray gets this stuff. I wouldn't quote a BMW rep at a show, since they are rarely the guys in the "know" about stuff like this. The sources I have are the same ones that were right about the S and the delays (and reasons for it), the arrival of the R, and all the info that was right about the new GT.

Here was my reply:

http://www.k-bikes.com/forums/showpo...33&postcount=4

Become a Supporting Member of K-Bikes.com
__________________
El Jeffe
Plano, TX
'06 K1200GT Crystal Grey
'04 Sprint RS Caspian Blue
__________________
"I can make a woman orgasm so hard she screams out random numbers. Those numbers end up being winning lottery numbers." - Techfiend
eljeffe is offline  
post #3 of 16 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2005, 12:35 pm
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 910
The new GT is a K-S Supertourer!

Yeah, scratching my head over this as well. First, even it were considered an lighter version of the LT, what's wrong with that?

Second, just spent some time at the local dealer yesterday; quite festive with a nice Christmas tree, roaring fire in the fireplace and my poor salesmanager in an arm cast from tearing his bicep lifting a heavy rock on his farm. His take on this is that the R12RT is more LT like with the fairing integrated mirrors and the wide look of the fairing. He has been surprised that more than a few customers have considered both the LT and RT and gone with the more recently designed RT.

Third, the new GT is a whopping 200 lbs lighter than the current LT, but a mere 50 lbs heavier than the K-S. And look what both the new GT and LT share: that great roaring new inline four cylinder engine, the fantastic Hossack suspension, the whole rear drive assembly, the new trellis frame, the adjustable rear suspension, canbus, and the whole electronic guage config.; and the same lean-forward riding postion - if you want it and adjust the steering appropriately.

Fourth: the subject heading of this thread is, therefore, completely misleading: the new GT is a "K-S supertourer"

Fifth: Riding this new GT is going to knock the socks off the unsuspecting. In real world performance, it will match the agility, acceleration, and long ride comfort of the K-S! I'm betting. Can't wait for the first riding reviews.

Miles
Miles_Miller is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 16 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2005, 3:04 pm
Enthusiast
 
brentboshart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Atwood, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 398
First, I have to confess I am "engine smoothness" obssessed. I love the near nil vibration level of my K1200RS. I was surprized by the amount of vibration of the K1200S that I test rode. Unless they took care of that with the GT model, I would not consider the GT to be a LT subsitute. A comfortable tourer has gotta be smooth and near vibration free in my thinking.

Brent Boshart
10 R1200GS ADV (his)
09 K1300S Light Grey (hers)
brentboshart is offline  
post #5 of 16 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2005, 4:08 pm
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 66
Yeah, the K1200RS is about as smooth as it can get- but it's the rubber mounts, not the engine. That engine is actually incredibly buzzy- you could try a k1100RS and see. The whole bloody bike buzzes everywhere. I remember the initial reviews of the K1200RS- one said that it was simply amazing- that BMW had gone from the most vibration in its class to the least in one step. My guess is that the GT will be solidly mounted but with an additional couple of years of development time, who knows on the LT? Certainly there would be enough room. . . .
kkugel is offline  
post #6 of 16 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2005, 4:26 pm
ROB
We're zoned for what ? cool !
 
ROB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lexington, NC, USA
Posts: 186
The buzz goes back further than that.

When I was shopping for my first K-bike in 1990, I rode both the K100RS and the K75S. That four cylinder had what I thought then were unacceptable levels of vibration, whereas the three cylinder was a lot smoother. So that's what I bought, and still have. So you're right, it's the rubber mounts in the K12RS that smooth it out, because the motor itself is a buzzsaw.

1990 K75S
2009 R1200GS
ROB is offline  
post #7 of 16 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2005, 5:00 pm
Enthusiast
 
karlb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Crockett, TX, USA
Posts: 395
Heck you want vibes, next time you ride your K12RS or GT drop your left foot back to the side stand knob and feel what the engine is really doing! amazing they could isolate it so well.

05 K1200S Blue (street bike)
01 996 Yellow (trackbike)
karlb is offline  
post #8 of 16 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2005, 5:23 pm
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 910
Quote:
Originally Posted by brentboshart
First, I have to confess I am "engine smoothness" obssessed. I love the near nil vibration level of my K1200RS. I was surprized by the amount of vibration of the K1200S that I test rode. Unless they took care of that with the GT model, I would not consider the GT to be a LT subsitute. A comfortable tourer has gotta be smooth and near vibration free in my thinking.
Brent,

It all depends on what you are looking for. Bob and Karl summed it pretty well. But, I have to tell you that as between the choice of a "special" rubberized sub-frame that weighs in at 56 lbs. to quell vibes and a very modern, high powered in-line four with twin counterbalancers, I'd take the one with the c.b.'s.

There's other considerations as well. When BMW went with the sub-frame on the K12RS, they had to raise the height of the engine more than an inch. This made the bike a bit top heavy. BMW was fortunate to be able to "lower" the new engine by tilting it forward to a near level 55 degrees making for an amazingly low c.o.g. It shows in the handling.

The new in-line engine is very narrow, more so than a typical 600 cc engine in a sportbike. This allowed for a very narrow sillouette in the new K bikes and the new GT. This means that the pegs are more inboard and consequently can be lower and give more leg-room w/o compromizing ground clearance.

I agree with you overall, though, the deamenor of the new engine is more raucous and bold, whereas the brick is the paragon of civility. Sure going to be interesting to see who has both the need for full saddlebags, more upright riding position, and a balsy performing engine at the same time!

Miles
Miles_Miller is offline  
post #9 of 16 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2005, 5:49 pm
Veteran
 
Pirate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Asheville, NC, USA
Posts: 1,624
Brent... I am also smoothness obsessed.. it's a curse.. and I also was VERY unimpressed when I first rode the new S.. and felt even worse after I bought one... I think I used the term .. "unforgivable" in my initial review..

However.. I have done a "John Kerry".. meaning flip-flopped 180 degrees on my opinion of the S. As the miles go on.. the engine starts to smooth out at ALL rpms.. Mine hasn't even got 600 miles on it and it's MUCH smoother than when I picked her up. I suspect that after 2000 miles or so both the engine and the clunky shifting will be just a bad memory like the Dukes of Hazzard..

Will the upcoming GT be as smooth as the RS or old GT?? I don't think so, but I do think it'll be smooth enough to make people happy.. I could be wrong..

Quote:
Originally Posted by brentboshart
First, I have to confess I am "engine smoothness" obssessed. I love the near nil vibration level of my K1200RS. I was surprized by the amount of vibration of the K1200S that I test rode. Unless they took care of that with the GT model, I would not consider the GT to be a LT subsitute. A comfortable tourer has gotta be smooth and near vibration free in my thinking.

Jerry D. Finley ("Danger" is my middle name)
"I speed, therefore I am. "

Pirate is offline  
post #10 of 16 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2005, 6:34 pm
Enthusiast
 
brentboshart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Atwood, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 398
Well, I have learned that smoothness/vibration is a relative thing. When I bought a R1150RT (no test ride - big mistake) I was unhappy with the amount of vibration, more than my old R100cs. I fought with that bike trying to make it run smoother (and the surging issue!). Finally, I decided it just was not going to work and I should stop whining and enjoy motorcycling more than this. Sold it and bought an used K1200RS. I've been infatuated with it ever since (1.5 seasons and 30k miles). Love that gliding through the air feeling (and yeah, I know it really is not smooth but well isolated..). When I had the RT, I rode my friend's GSXR1000 once in a while and was amazed at how smooth it was. Now, that I have my K1200RS, it seems like his gixxer vibrates a lot. Its all relative, its what you are accustomed to. Minimal vibration is acceptable, and who knows, maybe even desired with a sport bike but I think less tolerable on a more upright, fully faired machine. I love the looks of the K1200S, the new GT is tempting but my K1200RS just makes me grin from ear to ear very time I ride, so I'll just have to wait for the honeymoon to be over...

Brent Boshart
10 R1200GS ADV (his)
09 K1300S Light Grey (hers)
brentboshart is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the K-Bikes.com - Excellence in Motion forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official Canadian K1200GT PRice List RFWILSON K12/1300GT (Next Gen) 8 Dec 18th, 2005 1:59 am
BINGO!! - Official Pictures of the new KGT!! Miles_Miller K12/1300GT (Next Gen) 66 Dec 16th, 2005 8:24 pm
It's Official - New GT To Be At Long Beach Show!! Miles_Miller K12/1300GT (Next Gen) 5 Dec 9th, 2005 3:01 pm
Official R1200S pics Steve_Carlton General: F, G and R-Bikes Discussion 2 Nov 15th, 2005 1:11 am
BMW's Official Web-site for The K1200R ! LOCUS K12/1300R/R-Sport 0 Oct 15th, 2005 5:11 pm

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome