Well I've just had a test ride on the new K1200GT and thought I'd let you all know how it went. Before I do, let me tell you that my current bike is an R1200RT, I'm 6ft and weigh 16stone 7lbs (231lbs)
Having read all the brochures and seen that the GT is 20kg heavier than th RT I was expecting a heavy bike but the first thing I did was to take it off the centre stand, in between two bikes, and push the bike backwards into the car park this revealed that the weight is very low and the bike was easier to manouvre than my RT.
When riding, I noticed straight away that the seeting is completely different to the RT, you are tilted forward more in the hips and sit a lot closer too the tank on a narrower seat. This is actually very good for quick riding because you feel far more "in" the bike and not perched on top of it. However a downside maybe that your legs are more cramped but I had the bike for over 1 1/2 hours and didn't suffer in the legroom department.
The engine is extremely smooth and very powerful giving rapid accellaration but the big surprise to me was how tractable and smooth it was at low revs. For example on the RT I take roundabouts in either second or third gear however on the GT you are able to take them in fourth or fifith with no lumpyness in the delivery and sheer smooth traction from as little as 1500rpm. This makes the bike extremely easy to ride and coupled with the low slung weight very manouverable at slow speeds. I did however feel a vibration through the seat when the bike was in overun and I felt
When I got on the motorway I realised that the protection from the screen was not as good as the RT but has no adverse buffeting. The grunt form the engine was great for overtakes in top gear.
I managed to ride down a great "A" road and this is where I REALLY ENJOYED THE BIKE. I think this was due to the planted and secure feel of the Hossack front end. The bike was superb in its power delivery and also in the way it took corners. To best describe it would be summed up by saying that you felt as though you were riding a true sportsbike. It turned in to corners with little effort and held its given line over bumps and ruts and all this was on the Normal setting of the ESA. A friend of mine was riding a GSXR 600 K5 and he couldn't believe how fast I was going on such a big bike, to me it felt totally relaxed and easy going.
The next part of my ride took me through town which was again very comfortable and the bike was great to ride at slow speeds. Some have metioned the on off nature of the throttle but putting it into a higher gear stopped the aggressiveness abd the engine could pull the higher gears no problem.
As you may tell I'm now in a big dilema because although the bike was easier to ride had more power and was just as comfortable I can't decide whether to change from the RT. The only thing I didn't like about the GT was the look of side panels. They are a little too slab sided and I think the RT has a much better side profile. I think I'll sleep on it and make a decision tomorrow.
Keep posting your thoughts to help me decide.
Having read all the brochures and seen that the GT is 20kg heavier than th RT I was expecting a heavy bike but the first thing I did was to take it off the centre stand, in between two bikes, and push the bike backwards into the car park this revealed that the weight is very low and the bike was easier to manouvre than my RT.
When riding, I noticed straight away that the seeting is completely different to the RT, you are tilted forward more in the hips and sit a lot closer too the tank on a narrower seat. This is actually very good for quick riding because you feel far more "in" the bike and not perched on top of it. However a downside maybe that your legs are more cramped but I had the bike for over 1 1/2 hours and didn't suffer in the legroom department.
The engine is extremely smooth and very powerful giving rapid accellaration but the big surprise to me was how tractable and smooth it was at low revs. For example on the RT I take roundabouts in either second or third gear however on the GT you are able to take them in fourth or fifith with no lumpyness in the delivery and sheer smooth traction from as little as 1500rpm. This makes the bike extremely easy to ride and coupled with the low slung weight very manouverable at slow speeds. I did however feel a vibration through the seat when the bike was in overun and I felt
When I got on the motorway I realised that the protection from the screen was not as good as the RT but has no adverse buffeting. The grunt form the engine was great for overtakes in top gear.
I managed to ride down a great "A" road and this is where I REALLY ENJOYED THE BIKE. I think this was due to the planted and secure feel of the Hossack front end. The bike was superb in its power delivery and also in the way it took corners. To best describe it would be summed up by saying that you felt as though you were riding a true sportsbike. It turned in to corners with little effort and held its given line over bumps and ruts and all this was on the Normal setting of the ESA. A friend of mine was riding a GSXR 600 K5 and he couldn't believe how fast I was going on such a big bike, to me it felt totally relaxed and easy going.
The next part of my ride took me through town which was again very comfortable and the bike was great to ride at slow speeds. Some have metioned the on off nature of the throttle but putting it into a higher gear stopped the aggressiveness abd the engine could pull the higher gears no problem.
As you may tell I'm now in a big dilema because although the bike was easier to ride had more power and was just as comfortable I can't decide whether to change from the RT. The only thing I didn't like about the GT was the look of side panels. They are a little too slab sided and I think the RT has a much better side profile. I think I'll sleep on it and make a decision tomorrow.
Keep posting your thoughts to help me decide.